Lok Mandate

Parliamentary Panel Warns Meta Over PM Video Removal, Threatens Safe Harbour Revocation

An Indian parliamentary committee has warned Meta to apologise for removing a video featuring the Prime Minister or face losing its 'safe harbour' protection.

Lok Mandate DeskAugust 6, 20262 min read
Parliamentary Panel Warns Meta Over PM Video Removal, Threatens Safe Harbour Revocation

A parliamentary committee on information technology has issued a stern warning to tech giant Meta, demanding an apology for the removal of a video featuring the Prime Minister. The panel has indicated that failure to comply could result in Meta losing its “safe harbour” protection under India's Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000.

The directive from the Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology comes after the platform's decision to take down a video containing remarks by the Prime Minister. The committee views this action seriously, asserting that such content moderation by tech firms on matters involving India's top leadership warrants a clear explanation and rectification.

In a related development, the committee has also turned its attention to Google India. It has called for similar stringent action against the search giant, citing concerns over its alleged inaction regarding the proliferation of financial frauds on its platforms. This suggests a broader scrutiny of tech companies' content moderation policies and their responsibilities in India.

The “safe harbour” provision, enshrined in Section 79 of the IT Act, grants intermediaries, including social media platforms and search engines, general immunity from liability for user-generated content. The potential revocation of this status would mean these companies could be held directly accountable for content posted by their users, significantly altering their operational landscape in India.

This move underscores the Indian government's increasing assertiveness in regulating global tech firms operating within its borders. It signals a heightened expectation for these companies to align their content moderation practices with national interests and to proactively combat illegal or inappropriate content, particularly when it involves significant public figures or poses financial risks to citizens.